Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Seeks a new beginning between U.S., Muslims based on mutual respect

Source: America.gov

04 June 2009
(begin transcript)

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(Cairo, Egypt)
June 4, 2009

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON A NEW BEGINNING
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
1:10 P.M. (Local)

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you very much.  Good afternoon.  I am honored to be in the timeless city of Cairo, and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions.  For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning; and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt’s advancement.  And together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress.  I’m grateful for your hospitality, and the hospitality of the people of Egypt.  And I’m also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country:  Assalaamu alaykum. (Applause.)
We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world — tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate.  The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars.  More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations.  Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.

Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims.  The attacks of September 11, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights.  All this has bred more fear and more mistrust.

So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity.  And this cycle of suspicion and discord must end.
I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.  Instead, they overlap, and share common principles — principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight.  I know there’s been a lot of publicity about this speech, but no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I answer in the time that I have this afternoon all the complex questions that brought us to this point.  But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly to each other the things we hold in our hearts and that too often are said only behind closed doors.  There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground.  As the Holy Koran tells us, “Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.”  (Applause.)  That is what I will try to do today — to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.

Now part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I’m a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims.  As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk.  As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.

As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.  It was Islam — at places like Al-Azhar — that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe’s Renaissance and Enlightenment.  It was innovation in Muslim communities — (applause) — it was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed.  Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation.  And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.  (Applause.)

I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.  The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco.  In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President, John Adams, wrote, “The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims.”  And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.  They have fought in our wars, they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they’ve excelled in our sports arenas, they’ve won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch.  And when the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers — Thomas Jefferson — kept in his personal library.  (Applause.)

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.  That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t.  And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. (Applause.)

But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America.  (Applause.)  Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire.  The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known.  We were born out of revolution against an empire.  We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words — within our borders, and around the world.  We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept:  E pluribus unum — “Out of many, one.”

Now, much has been made of the fact that an African American with the name Barack Hussein Obama could be elected President. (Applause.)  But my personal story is not so unique.  The dream of opportunity for all people has not come true for everyone in America, but its promise exists for all who come to our shores — and that includes nearly 7 million American Muslims in our country today who, by the way, enjoy incomes and educational levels that are higher than the American average.  (Applause.)

Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one’s religion.  That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders.  That’s why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would deny it.  (Applause.)

So let there be no doubt:  Islam is a part of America.  And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations — to live in peace and security; to get an education and to work with dignity; to love our families, our communities, and our God.  These things we share.  This is the hope of all humanity.
Of course, recognizing our common humanity is only the beginning of our task.  Words alone cannot meet the needs of our people.  These needs will be met only if we act boldly in the years ahead; and if we understand that the challenges we face are shared, and our failure to meet them will hurt us all.

For we have learned from recent experience that when a financial system weakens in one country, prosperity is hurt everywhere.  When a new flu infects one human being, all are at risk.  When one nation pursues a nuclear weapon, the risk of nuclear attack rises for all nations.  When violent extremists operate in one stretch of mountains, people are endangered across an ocean.  When innocents in Bosnia and Darfur are slaughtered, that is a stain on our collective conscience.  (Applause.)  That is what it means to share this world in the 21st century.  That is the responsibility we have to one another as human beings.

And this is a difficult responsibility to embrace.  For human history has often been a record of nations and tribes — and, yes, religions — subjugating one another in pursuit of their own interests.  Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating.  Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.  So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it.  Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; our progress must be shared.  (Applause.)

Now, that does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite:  We must face these tensions squarely.  And so in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and as plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.
The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.
In Ankara, I made clear that America is not — and never will be — at war with Islam.  (Applause.)  We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security — because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject:  the killing of innocent men, women, and children.  And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America’s goals, and our need to work together.  Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support.  We did not go by choice; we went because of necessity. I’m aware that there’s still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11.  But let us be clear:  Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.  The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.  And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.  They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach.  These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.
Now, make no mistake:  We do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan.  We see no military — we seek no military bases there.  It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women.  It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict.  We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and now Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can.  But that is not yet the case.

And that’s why we’re partnering with a coalition of 46 countries.  And despite the costs involved, America’s commitment will not weaken.  Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists.  They have killed in many countries.  They have killed people of different faiths — but more than any other, they have killed Muslims.  Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam.  The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent is as — it is as if he has killed all mankind.  (Applause.)  And the Holy Koran also says whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind.  (Applause.)  The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism — it is an important part of promoting peace.
Now, we also know that military power alone is not going to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  That’s why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who’ve been displaced.  That’s why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend on.
Let me also address the issue of Iraq.  Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world.  Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible.  (Applause.)  Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said:  “I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be.”

Today, America has a dual responsibility:  to help Iraq forge a better future — and to leave Iraq to Iraqis.  And I have made it clear to the Iraqi people — (applause) — I have made it clear to the Iraqi people that we pursue no bases, and no claim on their territory or resources.  Iraq’s sovereignty is its own. And that’s why I ordered the removal of our combat brigades by next August.  That is why we will honor our agreement with Iraq’s democratically elected government to remove combat troops from Iraqi cities by July, and to remove all of our troops from Iraq by 2012.  (Applause.)  We will help Iraq train its security forces and develop its economy.  But we will support a secure and united Iraq as a partner, and never as a patron.

And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter or forget our principles.  Nine-eleven was an enormous trauma to our country.  The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our traditions and our ideals.  We are taking concrete actions to change course.  I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.  (Applause.)

So America will defend itself, respectful of the sovereignty of nations and the rule of law.  And we will do so in partnership with Muslim communities which are also threatened.  The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.

The second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world.
America’s strong bonds with Israel are well known.  This bond is unbreakable.  It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.

Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust.  Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich.  Six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today.  Denying that fact is baseless, it is ignorant, and it is hateful.  Threatening Israel with destruction — or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews — is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.

On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people — Muslims and Christians — have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.  For more than 60 years they’ve endured the pain of dislocation.  Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead.  They endure the daily humiliations — large and small — that come with occupation.  So let there be no doubt:  The situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable.  And America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own.  (Applause.)
For decades then, there has been a stalemate:  two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive.  It’s easy to point fingers — for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought about by Israel’s founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond.  But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth:  The only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.  (Applause.)

That is in Israel’s interest, Palestine’s interest, America’s interest, and the world’s interest.  And that is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience and dedication that the task requires.  (Applause.)  The obligations — the obligations that the parties have agreed to under the road map are clear.  For peace to come, it is time for them — and all of us — to live up to our responsibilities.

Palestinians must abandon violence.  Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and it does not succeed.  For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation.  But it was not violence that won full and equal rights.  It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America’s founding.  This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia.  It’s a story with a simple truth:  that violence is a dead end.  It is a sign neither of courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus.  That’s not how moral authority is claimed; that’s how it is surrendered.

Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build.  The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have to recognize they have responsibilities.  To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, recognize Israel’s right to exist.

At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel’s right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine’s.  The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.  (Applause.)  This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace.  It is time for these settlements to stop.  (Applause.)

And Israel must also live up to its obligation to ensure that Palestinians can live and work and develop their society.  Just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel’s security; neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank. Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be a critical part of a road to peace, and Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.

And finally, the Arab states must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities.  The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems.  Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state, to recognize Israel’s legitimacy, and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.
America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and we will say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs.  (Applause.)  We cannot impose peace.  But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away.  Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state.  It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true.

Too many tears have been shed.  Too much blood has been shed.  All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of the three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra — (applause) — as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed, peace be upon them, joined in prayer.  (Applause.)

The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons.
This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.  For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is in fact a tumultuous history between us.  In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government.  Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians.  This history is well known.  Rather than remain trapped in the past, I’ve made it clear to Iran’s leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward.  The question now is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.

I recognize it will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude, and resolve.  There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect.  But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point.  This is not simply about America’s interests.  It’s about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.

I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not.  No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.  And that’s why I strongly reaffirmed America’s commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons.  (Applause.)  And any nation — including Iran — should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  That commitment is at the core of the treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I’m hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

The fourth issue that I will address is democracy.  (Applause.)
I know — I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years, and much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq.  So let me be clear: No system of government can or should be imposed by one nation by any other.

That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people.  Each nation gives life to this principle in its own way, grounded in the traditions of its own people.  America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election.  But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things:  the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose.  These are not just American ideas; they are human rights.  And that is why we will support them everywhere.  (Applause.)

Now, there is no straight line to realize this promise.  But this much is clear:  Governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure.  Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away.  America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them.  And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments — provided they govern with respect for all their people.
This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they’re out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others.  (Applause.)  So no matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who would hold power:  You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party.  Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Barack Obama, we love you!

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom.

Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.  We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition.  I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia, where devout Christians worshiped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country.  That is the spirit we need today.  People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul.  This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive, but it’s being challenged in many different ways.

Among some Muslims, there’s a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of somebody else’s faith.  The richness of religious diversity must be upheld — whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt.  (Applause.)  And if we are being honest, fault lines must be closed among Muslims, as well, as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together.  We must always examine the ways in which we protect it.  For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation.  That’s why I’m committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.

Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit — for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.  We can’t disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism.
In fact, faith should bring us together.  And that’s why we’re forging service projects in America to bring together Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  That’s why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah’s interfaith dialogue and Turkey’s leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations.  Around the world, we can turn dialogue into interfaith service, so bridges between peoples lead to action — whether it is combating malaria in Africa, or providing relief after a natural disaster.

The sixth issue — the sixth issue that I want to address is women’s rights.  (Applause.)  I know –- I know — and you can tell from this audience, that there is a healthy debate about this issue.  I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality.  (Applause.)  And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Now, let me be clear:  Issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam.  In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, we’ve seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead.  Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.

I am convinced that our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons.  (Applause.)  Our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity — men and women — to reach their full potential.  I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice.  And that is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.  (Applause.)

Finally, I want to discuss economic development and opportunity.
I know that for many, the face of globalization is contradictory.  The Internet and television can bring knowledge and information, but also offensive sexuality and mindless violence into the home.  Trade can bring new wealth and opportunities, but also huge disruptions and change in communities.  In all nations — including America — this change can bring fear.  Fear that because of modernity we lose control over our economic choices, our politics, and most importantly our identities — those things we most cherish about our communities, our families, our traditions, and our faith.

But I also know that human progress cannot be denied.  There need not be contradictions between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies enormously while maintaining distinct cultures.  The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim-majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai.  In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.
And this is important because no development strategy can be based only upon what comes out of the ground, nor can it be sustained while young people are out of work.  Many Gulf states have enjoyed great wealth as a consequence of oil, and some are beginning to focus it on broader development.  But all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century — (applause) — and in too many Muslim communities, there remains underinvestment in these areas.  I’m emphasizing such investment within my own country.  And while America in the past has focused on oil and gas when it comes to this part of the world, we now seek a broader engagement.

On education, we will expand exchange programs, and increase scholarships, like the one that brought my father to America.  (Applause.)  At the same time, we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities.  And we will match promising Muslim students with internships in America; invest in online learning for teachers and children around the world; and create a new online network, so a young person in Kansas can communicate instantly with a young person in Cairo.

On economic development, we will create a new corps of business volunteers to partner with counterparts in Muslim-majority countries.  And I will host a Summit on Entrepreneurship this year to identify how we can deepen ties between business leaders, foundations and social entrepreneurs in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.

On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim-majority countries, and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create more jobs.  We’ll open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, and appoint new science envoys to collaborate on programs that develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water, grow new crops.  Today I’m announcing a new global effort with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio.  And we will also expand partnerships with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.
All these things must be done in partnership.  Americans are ready to join with citizens and governments; community organizations, religious leaders, and businesses in Muslim communities around the world to help our people pursue a better life.

The issues that I have described will not be easy to address.  But we have a responsibility to join together on behalf of the world that we seek — a world where extremists no longer threaten our people, and American troops have come home; a world where Israelis and Palestinians are each secure in a state of their own, and nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes; a world where governments serve their citizens, and the rights of all God’s children are respected.  Those are mutual interests.  That is the world we seek.  But we can only achieve it together.

I know there are many — Muslim and non-Muslim — who question whether we can forge this new beginning.  Some are eager to stoke the flames of division, and to stand in the way of progress.  Some suggest that it isn’t worth the effort — that we are fated to disagree, and civilizations are doomed to clash. Many more are simply skeptical that real change can occur.  There’s so much fear, so much mistrust that has built up over the years.  But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward.  And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith, in every country — you, more than anyone, have the ability to reimagine the world, to remake this world.

All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart, or whether we commit ourselves to an effort — a sustained effort — to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children, and to respect the dignity of all human beings.

It’s easier to start wars than to end them.  It’s easier to blame others than to look inward.  It’s easier to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share.  But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path.  There’s one rule that lies at the heart of every religion — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.  (Applause.)  This truth transcends nations and peoples — a belief that isn’t new; that isn’t black or white or brown; that isn’t Christian or Muslim or Jew.  It’s a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization, and that still beats in the hearts of billions around the world.  It’s a faith in other people, and it’s what brought me here today.

We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written.
The Holy Koran tells us:  “O mankind!  We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.”

The Talmud tells us:  “The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace.”
The Holy Bible tells us:  “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”  (Applause.)

The people of the world can live together in peace.  We know that is God’s vision.  Now that must be our work here on Earth.

Thank you.  And may God’s peace be upon you.  Thank you very much.  Thank you.

(Applause.)
END      2:05 P.M. (Local)
(end transcript)

(All population figures are taken from Wikipedia)

Population of Gaza        1.4 million
Total killed                     1,135 (as of Friday, January 16, 2009)
Total Injured                  5,200 (as of Friday, January 16, 2009)

= 0.081072 % of the Gaza population killed
= 0.371428 % of the Gaza population injured

Now let’s compare those figures with some other countries as a percentage of population. If the current War on Gaza was being conducted somewhere else, with the same percentage of casualties, would the world still be silent? Imagine if one nation was attacking another with the following results after 20 days. Would the USA still be supporting that nation and giving it protection in the United Nations?
Let’s have a look.

War On Gaza: A Comparative Analysis of Casualties

If it happened in these countries:

Australia
Total Population              21,468,700
Killed In 20 DAYS         17,405
Injured In 20 DAYS       79,741

Malaysia
Total Population               27,730,000
Killed In 20 DAYS            22,481
Injured In 20 DAYS       102,997

United Kingdom
Total Population              60,975,000
Killed In 20 DAYS         49,434
Injured In 20 DAYS      226,478

France
Total Population               65,073,482
Killed In 20 DAYS            52,756
Injured In 20 DAYS        241,701

Egypt
Total Population               75,500,662
Killed In 20 DAYS            61,210
Injured In 20 DAYS        280,431

Japan
Total Population               127,433,494
Killed In 20 DAYS            103,313
Injured In 20 DAYS        473,324

Indonesia
Total Population               222,000,000
Killed In 20 DAYS            179,980
Injured In 20 DAYS        824,570

USA
Total Population               306,150,000
Killed In 20 DAYS            248,202
Injured In 20 DAYS        1,137,127

India
Total Population               1,147,995,904
Killed In 20 DAYS            930,703
Injured In 20 DAYS       4,263,978

This should give us some perspective.

Would the world still be silent if SEVENTEEN THOUSAND (17,405) AUSTRALIAN citizens had been killed by a foreign military power, and another SEVENTY NINE THOUSAND (79,741) had been injured in just 20 days?

Would the world still be silent if FORTY NINE THOUSAND (49,434) BRITISH citizens had been killed by a foreign military power, and another TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND (226,478) had been injured in just 20 days?

Would the world still be silent if TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND (248,000) AMERICAN citizens had been killed by a foreign military power, and another 1.1 MILLION (1,137,127) had been injured in just 20 days???

I wonder what the world would be saying if the same slaughter was taking place somewhere else, and white, Christian women and children made up almost 50% of the casualties, and the numbers were as above. Would the reaction of many westerners be different? Israel says that their war in Gaza is not against civilians. Quite strange then, that civilians keep getting themselves killed and having their arms and legs blown off.

But they are not white, Christian women and children… so who cares!

Gene Netto
Jakarta, Indonesia

We Will Not Go Down (Song for Gaza)

A blinding flash of white light
Lit up the sky over Gaza tonight
People running for cover
Not knowing whether they’re dead or alive

They came with their tanks and their planes
With ravaging fiery flames
And nothing remains
Just a voice rising up in the smoky haze

We will not go down
In the night, without a fight
You can burn up our mosques and our homes and our schools
But our spirit will never die
We will not go down
In Gaza tonight

Women and children alike
Murdered and massacred night after night
While the so-called leaders of countries afar
Debated on who’s wrong or right

But their powerless words were in vain
And the bombs fell down like acid rain
But through the tears and the blood and the pain
You can still hear that voice through the smoky haze

We will not go down
In the night, without a fight
You can burn up our mosques and our homes and our schools
But our spirit will never die
We will not go down
In Gaza tonight

Watch on You Tube

Download Mpeg3

7 January 2009

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if the situation between the Muslim Palestinians in Gaza and the Jews in Israel was reversed.

I wonder what would happen if Israel had never existed because they had lost their “war of independence”, which had then left millions of Jews blockaded in ghettos and refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza. Thus, the current state of Israel would instead be a developed Muslim Palestinian state, with full military and economic control over the Jewish refugees in Gaza and the West Bank. The Gaza Strip would instead be known as the “Gaza Ghetto”, home to 1.5 million Jewish refugees who had nowhere else to go.

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if the Jews in the Gaza Ghetto could no longer stand living under a military and economic blockade from the Muslim Palestinians and began to fight back, even though they knew they could not win. The leaders of the Jews in Kadima (the largest elected party in Gaza) might speak words of defiance against the Muslim occupiers. Kadima might get their hands on some rockets and try to demonstrate their defiance against the Muslim Palestinian army who had blockaded the Jews in Gaza Ghetto for 1.5 years, and had held them under occupation for decades.

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if the Muslim Palestinian military responded to those rocket attacks by dropping bombs on the heavily populated Gaza Ghetto for a week and then entered Gaza with tanks, blowing up buildings, homes, UN-protected schools, and anything else that they wished to destroy. Then, the Muslim army would simply say to the media, “We are just defending ourselves against Kadima. They are terrorists. For some reason, the Kadima terrorists will not accept being imprisoned indefinitely in Gaza Ghetto, and they have fired rockets at Southern Palestine from inside Gaza. The Kadima terrorists broke the ceasefire, so we have to destroy them. We are only defending ourselves. Ten Muslims have been killed by the Muslim terrorists, so it is our right to kill hundreds of Jews and injure thousands more. One Muslim life is worth a hundred Jews.”

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if Russia (replacing the United States of America as the current protector of Israel) continuously used its veto power in the Security Council to block any formal statement of condemnation by the United Nations against the Muslim Palestinians. I wonder what the United States would say if the Russians consistently defended all actions by the Muslim Palestinians and insisted that the state of Palestine had a right to defend itself against Kadima rocket attacks, even if it meant the deaths of hundreds of innocent Jews in Gaza.

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what the United States and the European Union would say if Russia issued a formal statement saying, “We have no problem with the Jewish civilians in Gaza Ghetto. They are not the problem. It’s Kadima. They are the terrorists. We will not negotiate with terrorists. Kadima must be destroyed. The Jewish refugees in Gaza have no right to attack the Muslims in Palestine from within Gaza Ghetto. This is a war against terror. The Jews are the terrorists. Jews are not permitted to show any acts of defiance towards Muslim occupiers.”

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if the governments in Europe, England, and America, saw more than 760 Jews killed in Gaza and another 3,000 wounded in only 13 days, where the majority of them were civilians and about 30% of them were innocent Jewish children. Perhaps the world would simply watch as this slaughter was carried out by well-armed Muslim Palestinian soldiers, and all attempts to bring about a ceasefire would constantly be blocked by Russia. Russia would then inform the media that the superior Muslim army had every right to defend the state of Palestine by dropping bombs on densely populated areas in Gaza that were filled with Jewish civilians.

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if Egypt refused to open its border to let the Jewish civilians in Gaza Ghetto escape. I wonder what the world would say if Egypt refused to open its border to allow medicine, food, water, petrol (for generators at the hospitals) and other essential supplies to enter Gaza Ghetto in order to help ease the suffering of the Jewish civilians.

I wonder what the world would say to Egypt.
I wonder what the world would say to Russia because it allowed so many Jewish civilians to be killed by a sophisticated Muslim Palestinian army and then continued to give the Muslims absolute protection from the United Nations.
I wonder what the political leaders and citizens of the United States of America would say. Would they continue to be silent as they are now?

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if CNN showed interviews with doctors stuck in the hospitals in Gaza, and they said, “About thirty percent of the casualties are Jewish children. They are dying before we can treat them because there are just too many. We are running out of supplies. Why won’t the world come to the aid of the innocent Jewish civilians in Gaza? Why are the Muslim Palestinians allowed to bomb Gaza in this way? Where is the international community? Why are they not taking action to protect the lives of innocent Jews in Gaza?”

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if CNN showed an elderly Jewish rabbi running along a street in Gaza with his dead child in his arms. His prayer shawl and shirt were stained red with blood, his bleeding wife running beside him, and scenes of chaos and destruction visible behind them as they ran for their lives. The rabbi would scream at the camera crew, and say, “Why are they killing innocent Jewish civilians? What did we do? We are not members of Kadima. We do not fire rockets. Why did the Muslims have to kill my son? Why will no one come to our defense?”

I wonder what would happen.
I wonder what would happen if all of the above were true and happening right now. I wonder if the decent and peaceful citizens of the world (who I believe are the majority) were watching this on television. I wonder how many ordinary mother and fathers, teenagers and elderly people would continue to remain silent if this slaughter was being conducted against a Jewish civilian population in Gaza.
Would people be outraged? Would they join in national protests? Would they hold their elected leaders accountable and demand that action be taken immediately to stop the violence?

I wonder what would happen if the people of the world valued the life of an innocent Muslim child as highly as they seem to value the life of an innocent Jewish child.

I wonder what would happen if the situation in Gaza was reversed.

Gene Netto
Jakarta, Indonesia

boy-killed-by-teacherAn Egyptian teacher has been jailed for beating an 11 year old student to death, for not doing his homework. Math teacher Haitham Nabeel Abdelhamid, 23, took Islam Amr Badr outside the classroom and hit him violently in the stomach. The boy fainted and later died in hospital of heart failure in the city of Alexandria.

The court was told the boy had four broken ribs. The teacher said he only meant to discipline the pupil and did not mean to hurt anyone. The teacher’s lawyer was quoted as saying in court: “Hitting [a child] is not banned in schools and my client did not break the law.” In the state education system, young, inexperienced and under-resourced teachers often struggle to control classes of 60 to 100 children.

********

When parents talk about punishing students with any form of physical violence, they often don’t realize the consequences. This is just one extreme example of what can go wrong if teachers can’t control classes without needing to hit them.
Many parents might also hit their children at home and so they see no problem with teachers smacking or hitting children as they think it creates discipline. Unfortunately, they don’t realize what can occur as a result. Although this case revolves around the death of the child, there are probably many more cases where the student became permanently traumatized, and because no death occurred, the event did not get covered by the media. So, parents don’t know how frequently such beatings might occur.

Trained teachers can teach without hitting students. Poorer countries need to start investing serious amounts of money in education if they want the next generation to build a prosperous nation.

Regards,
Gene Netto

Read the full article here:
Boy-killing Egypt teacher jailed

Egypt teacher tried over beating
Story from BBC NEWS:

If you have, or know someone who has, an overweight child under the age of five, it might be wise to share this article with them. The result of this study shows that obese teenagers actually gain their increase in body fat before the age of five, not during their school years as previously thought. Some highlights:
Compared to children in the 1980s, today’s youngsters are fatter and most of their excess weight gain happens before school age, they will say. This suggests initiatives to prevent childhood obesity should be started before school, suggest the authors.
One in four children aged four to five in England are overweight, latest figures show. Before an obese girl reaches school age she will have already gained 90% of her excess weight, and boys will have gained 70% of their excess weight.
Lead researcher Professor Terry Wilkin, of the Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, said: “When they reach the age of five the die seems to be cast, at least until the age of puberty. “What is causing it is very difficult to know.” He said there must be a factor now that was not there 25 years ago which is making today’s children obese. And, given the young age, this is likely to be in a child’s home rather than school environment and linked to upbringing rather than schooling.

Read the full article here:
Obesity set before age of five
Story from BBC NEWS:

This post was originally in Indonesian. Sorry for any mistakes in translation.

(This email was received from an Indonesian Teacher)

In a meeting with all of the parents of student candidates for a bilingual class in one Junior High School, I tried to compare their expectations with our version of reality in the school. To be more precise, I tried to lower the parent’s expectations as they were too high about the teachers’ level of English.

There are three conditions where English would be used in the bilingual class. In general, the use of English was as follows:

Firstly, English was used as the introductory language to open and close the class. Opening the class including greeting, conducting an opening prayer, and light talk (= minor discussions).

Secondly, English was used as the language to give the everyday orders from the teacher to the pupils. For example please open your book at page 5, come forward, work in pairs, put away your books, prepare a piece of paper, don’t cheat, and so on. All of the teachers that taught in the bilingual class, except the teacher for bahasa Indonesia, were obliged to use English in the two conditions above. They were trained repeatedly to confirm that their pronunciation was at least comprehensible enough (could be understood) by the pupils. We could not hope to have native-like language production (= we did not hope the use of English would be like a native-speaker). That was simply too far-fetched (= it really was not possible). Continue Reading »

This post was originally in Indonesian. Sorry for any mistakes in translation.

SBI = International Standard Schools, a new program launched by the Indonesia government to give public money to selected schools in the hope they will provide an international standard of education for the kids lucky enough to get in to those select public schools. Other kids in other public schools get nothing.

[This email was received from a support teacher in a SBI school in Jakarta. He (or she) complains about the poor state of those schools. We hope the government will pay attention and do something to fix this mess.]

********
I am a support teacher in one of the pioneering SBI schools in Jakarta. I want to cry when I witness the deception made against my pupils by our educational decision makers. Teaching is carried out by one class teacher and one support teacher who can speak English. During my first days in this class, the pupils enthusiastically spoke English with their peers and with the teachers. But eventually, their enthusiasm dropped significantly when they did not get a good response in English. If a pupil asked something in English, then I had to translate into Indonesian so the class teacher could understand. Then the class teacher would answer in Indonesian and his answer was translated by me into English for the students. Continue Reading »

It’s amazing how stupid some parents can be. I can’t imagine ever giving a submachine gun to a primary school child. I have a nephew aged 8, and I won’t even give him kitchen knives because I think they are too sharp for him. I couldn’t imagine seeing him with a gun, or worse, a submachine gun that can fire hundreds of rounds per minute.
I hope guns don’t ever become that common in Indonesia.

Gene
########
New questions have been raised about US gun laws after a boy aged eight shot himself in the head with a submachine gun at a Massachusetts weapons fair.
Christopher Bizilj died after losing control of a recoiling Uzi submachine gun as he fired it at a pumpkin. Both the boy’s father and an instructor were present when the accident happened on Sunday at the gun show in Westfield. State legislators are now considering drafting a bill banning under-21s from firing automatic weapons, reports say.
The boy’s father, Charles Bizilj, said he was 10ft (3m) behind Christopher when the accident happened at the Machine Gun Shoot and Firearms Expo. “This is a horrible event, a horrible travesty, and I really don’t know why it happened,” said Mr Bizilj, a hospital director from Ashford, Connecticut.
Read the full article here:
Death at show fuels US gun debate
Story from BBC NEWS:

Josephson Institute’s 2008 Report Card on the Ethics of American Youth is based on a survey of nearly 30,000 students in high schools across the U.S. The results paint a troubling picture of our future politicians and parents, cops and corporate executives, and journalists and generals.

LOS ANGELES, IN – Josephson Institute’s 2008 Report Card on the Ethics of American Youth, a report on the attitudes and conduct of 29,760 high school students, reveals entrenched habits of dishonesty in today’s young people – and that doesn’t bode well for the future when these youngsters become the next generation’s politicians and parents, cops and corporate executives, and journalists and generals.

STEALING.

In bad news for business, more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) – a total of 30 percent overall – admitted stealing from a store within the past year. In 2006 the overall theft rate was 28 percent (32 percent males, 23 percent females).
Students who attend private secular and religious schools were less likely to steal, but still the theft rate among non-religious independent school students was more than one in five (21 percent) while 19 percent who attend religious schools also admitted stealing something from a store in the past year.
Honors students (21 percent), student leaders (24 percent) and students involved in youth activities like the YMCA and school service clubs (27 percent) were less likely to steal, but still more than one in five committed theft.
Twenty-three percent said they stole something from a parent or other relative in the past year(the same as 2006) and 20 percent confessed they stole something from a friend. Boys were nearly twice as likely to steal from a friend as girls (26 percent to 14 percent).

LYING.

More than two of five (42 percent) said that they sometimes lie to save money. Again, the male-female difference was significant: 49 percent of the males, 36 percent of the females. In 2006, 39 percent said they lied to save money (47 percent males, 31 percent females).
Thirty-nine percent of students in private religious schools admitted to lying as did 35 percent of the students attending private non-religious schools.
More than eight in ten students (83 percent) from public schools and religious private schools confessed they lied to a parent about something significant. Students attending non-religious independent schools were somewhat less likely to lie to parents (78 percent).

CHEATING.

Cheating in school continues to be rampant and it’s getting worse. A substantial majority (64 percent) cheated on a test during the past year (38 percent did so two or more times), up from 60 percent and 35 percent in 2006. There were no gender differences on the issue of cheating on exams.
Students attending non-religious independent schools reported the lowest cheating rate (47 percent) while 63 percent of students from religious schools cheated.
Responses about cheating show some geographic disparity: Seventy percent of the students residing in the southeastern U.S. admitted to cheating, compared to 64 percent in the west, 63 percent in the northeast, and 59 percent in the midwest.
More than one in three (36 percent) said they used the Internet to plagiarize an assignment. In 2006 the figure was 33 percent.

IT’S WORSE THAN IT APPEARS.

As bad as these numbers are, it appears they understate the level of dishonesty exhibited by America’s youth. More than one in four (26 percent) confessed they lied on at least one or two questions on the survey. Experts agree that dishonesty on surveys usually is an attempt to conceal misconduct.
Despite these high levels of dishonesty, these same kids have a high self-image when it comes to ethics. A whopping 93 percent said they were satisfied with their personal ethics and character and 77 percent said that “when it comes to doing what is right, I am better than most people I know.”

A complete set of data generated by the survey is available at http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard.
This report addresses honesty and integrity and is the first based on the extensive data gathered. Additional reports, to be issued in the coming months, will focus on violence, drug use, and other issues. Some will analyze the impact of sports, religious convictions, and other factors on young people`s values, attitudes, and behavior.

Following a benchmark survey in 1992, Josephson Institute has conducted a national survey of the ethics of American youth every two years. Data was gathered through a national sample of public and private high schools. Surveys were conducted in 2008. For the general questions (over 20,000 responses), the accuracy is well within +/- 0.007 or 0.7%; for breakdowns of 10,000 the accuracy is +/- 0.98%; and even when there are just 1,000 responses, the accuracy is +/- 3.1%. Almost all standard errors of differences are much less than 1% for even small samples. These statistics have been verified by the Department Chair, Decision Sciences & Marketing, Graziadio School of Business & Management, Pepperdine University.

Source: The Ethics of American Youth – 2008 summary

Older Posts »